MmowW› Bibliothèque Food › haccp-principle-2-ccp-determination
DEEP DIVE · PUBLIÉ 2026-04-28

Principle 2 Ccp Determination — Deep Dive (Haccp, international)

A deep-dive treatment of Principle 2 Ccp Determination as a sub-topic of haccp in international. Written for operators ready to move past the basics.

1. Why this sub-topic matters

Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points (HACCP) is the food-safety system codified by Codex Alimentarius[1] and adopted into the law of more than 140 countries. Built around seven principles and a twelve-step implementation cycle, HACCP focuses limited operator attention on the few process steps where loss of control would mean an unsafe product reaching the consumer. In international, the controlling reference is the national regulator[2]; the international baseline is Codex CXC 1-1969 Rev.2020[3]. Within that, Principle 2 Ccp Determination is the leverage point most often under-implemented in field audits.

2. Authority-grounded approach

Codex Alimentarius[1] sets the international baseline; in international the controlling text is the national authority publication[2]. Audit-recognised standards (ISO 22000, FSSC 22000, BRCGS) operationalise the requirement[3].

3. KPI targets

IndicatorBaselineTargetTimeMeasurement
Hazard analysis worksheet completion45%100% of menu items1 monthPer-menu CL
CCPs identified per signature dish (3 items)0–12–31 monthCodex Decision Tree
Missed CCP records>5/month0/month3 monthsDaily log audit
Staff HACCP comprehension60/10090+/1002 weeks10-question quiz
Monthly hygiene-management reportNone1/month2 monthsPDF generation

4. Process flow

1
Receiving

Lot+temperature record

▼
2
Cold storage

≤ 4°C with logger

▼
3
Prep / cutting

Colour-coded equipment

▼
4
★ Cooking (CCP)

≥ 75°C core for ≥ 1 min

▼
5
★ Cooling (CCP)

60→10°C in ≤90 min

▼
6
Service / dispatch

≤ 2h post-cook or ≤ 4°C cold chain

5. Daily checklist

Daily kitchen haccp checklist

6. Five common failures — and the fix from the regulator

  1. Skipping documentation. Codex requires written ownership for Principle 2 Ccp Determination.
  2. Treating Principle 2 Ccp Determination as one-off rather than continuous.
  3. Buying tools without training the team that will use them.
  4. Reviewing the plan only after a near-miss instead of on schedule.
  5. Confusing PRP-level controls with true CCPs at this step.

7. International case context

🇯🇵Japan

Tokyo restaurant HACCP adoption rose from 22% (2018) to 95% (2023) under coordinated MHLW guidance and Tokyo public-health-centre on-site coaching.

Source: Tokyo Metropolitan Government — Status of HACCP Institutionalisation March 2023.

🇬🇧United Kingdom

FSA SFBB and FHRS reduced food-borne illness incidence 27% versus 2010 across 500,000+ premises; 89% now hold a Rating of 4 or higher.

Source: Food Standards Agency (UK) — Annual Report 2024 / SFBB / FHRS.

🇺🇸United States

FDA FSMA Preventive Controls (21 CFR 117) cut U.S. food-recall events 31% and outbreak counts 28% versus the 2016 baseline.

Source: FDA — FSMA Implementation Status Report 2023.

🇪🇺European Union

EC 852/2004 mandates HACCP-based hygiene management for all food-business operators; RASFF early-warning detection grew +52% versus 2010.

Source: European Commission / EFSA — Food Safety in the EU 2023 / Regulation (EC) 852/2004.

🇨🇦Canada

Canada SFCR Preventive Control Plan (2019–) is associated with a 35% reduction in food-related fatalities.

Source: Canadian Food Inspection Agency — SFCR Preventive Control Plan.

8. Operator dialogue

🦉 & 🐣 & 🐮 — A 5-round operator’s dialogue

🐣
Piyo: Poppo-san, where does Principle 2 Ccp Determination actually start in a real kitchen?
🦉
Poppo: It starts with reading the authority text once and writing one decision. Codex sets the international baseline; your national regulator binds you to a specific value or method.
🐣
Piyo: What if the staff resist the new rule?
🦉
Poppo: Show them the failure mode it prevents and the time it saves. Authority handbooks (FSA SFBB, MHLW small-business guidance) describe the minimum viable system — you adapt, you don’t reinvent.
🐮
Mou: Strong, kind, beautiful: Principle 2 Ccp Determination made blissful for everyone in the kitchen.

Pièges courants (d'après les rapports d'inspection)

  1. Le plan est traité comme de la paperasse, pas comme un système vivant
  2. Les enregistrements sont complétés en fin de service
  3. Le nombre de CCPs est choisi par intuition, pas par l'arbre Codex
  4. L'examen annuel est sauté, le plan se pétrifie
  5. L'information allergénique est dans la tête d'un vétéran

Mesures correctives recommandées par les autorités

  1. Passer aux enregistrements électroniques, consultables à tout moment
  2. Appliquer mécaniquement l'arbre décisionnel Codex
  3. Examen annuel + mise à jour immédiate aux changements
  4. Nommer par écrit le responsable de chaque CCP
  5. Former toutes les équipes à la version vivante du plan

Contexte des bonnes pratiques internationales

Codex Alimentarius CXC 1-1969 Rev.2020 fixe la référence mondiale ; FDA (USA), FSA (UK), EFSA & Commission européenne (UE), MHLW (Japon) et CFIA (Canada) le mettent en œuvre localement. Les exploitants qui importent ou exportent des aliments bénéficient d'une compréhension simultanée des cinq cadres.

Hibou & Poussin & Vache — dialogue d'exploitant

🐣
Piyo: Poppo, le HACCP n'est-il que de la paperasse ?
🦉
Poppo: Non. Le HACCP est un système vivant. Codex CXC 1-1969 Rev.2020 exige examen annuel et mise à jour immédiate.
🐣
Piyo: Combien de CCPs ?
🦉
Poppo: Ce que dit l'arbre décisionnel Codex appliqué mécaniquement. Pour un plat phare, typiquement 1-3 CCPs.
🐮
Meuh: Nous en avions cinq, l'inspecteur a demandé 'pourquoi cinq?' — impossible à répondre. Maintenant chaque CCP est défendable.🐮
🐣
Piyo: Et si l'on échoue au début ?
🦉
Poppo: Codex consacre l'amélioration continue. 1% par mois = 12% par an, 36% en trois ans.
🐮
Meuh: Fort, bienveillant, beau — le HACCP est le langage commun mondial.🐮

Essayez l'arbre décisionnel CCP gratuit de MmowW

Identifiez les points critiques de votre menu en 5 minutes — aligné sur Codex CXC 1-1969 Annexe II, gratuit en 6 langues.

Ouvrir l'outil gratuit →

Primary sources (national & international authorities)

  1. Codex Alimentarius — General Principles of Food Hygiene CXC 1-1969 Rev.2020 (HACCP Annex II). https://www.fao.org/fao-who-codexalimentarius/
  2. FAO — HACCP System and Guidelines for its Application. https://www.fao.org/3/y1390e/y1390e0a.htm
  3. WHO — Five Keys to Safer Food Manual (2006). https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241594639
  4. CDC — Food Safety Surveillance & Outbreak Reports. https://www.cdc.gov/foodsafety/
  5. FDA — 21 CFR Part 117 Preventive Controls for Human Food. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-21/chapter-I/subchapter-B/part-117
  6. Food Standards Agency (UK) — Annual Report 2024 / SFBB / FHRS. https://www.food.gov.uk/business-guidance/safer-food-better-business
  7. MHLW (Japan) — HACCP Institutionalisation & Follow-up Survey 2023. https://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/seisakunitsuite/bunya/kenkou_iryou/shokuhin/haccp/index.html
  8. Canadian Food Inspection Agency — SFCR Preventive Control Plan. https://inspection.canada.ca/en/preventive-controls
  9. ISO 22000:2018 — Food safety management systems. https://www.iso.org/iso-22000-food-safety-management.html

Prêt à automatiser votre HACCP ?

MmowW F👀D SaaS enregistre températures, nettoyage et preuves chaque jour — un clic. Votre badge de confiance 4 axes grandit automatiquement.

Démarrer l'essai gratuit de 14 jours →

Aucune carte bancaire requise. À partir de 29,99 $/mois.

Avertissement important : MmowW n'est pas un organisme de certification en sécurité alimentaire. Le contenu ci-dessus est un écrit pédagogique de bonnes pratiques distillé depuis des sources primaires d'autorités nationales. La responsabilité finale de la conformité au Codex, FDA, FSA, EFSA, MHLW, CFIA ou à toute autre exigence nationale incombe à l'exploitant alimentaire et à l'autorité compétente.