MmowW› Food-Bibliothek › compare-brcgs-vs-sqf
COMPARISON · VERÖFFENTLICHT 2026-04-28 Updated 2026-04-28

BRCGS vs SQF — Labeling Comparison

A side-by-side comparison of BRCGS and SQF in the context of labeling.

Quick Answer

A side-by-side comparison of BRCGS and SQF in the context of labeling.

📑 Inhaltsverzeichnis
  1. 1. Quick comparison table
  2. 2. When to choose which
  3. 3. Daily checklist for both
  4. 4. KPI targets that align both standards
  5. 5. International best-practice context
    1. 🇯🇵Japan
    2. 🇬🇧United Kingdom
    3. 🇺🇸United States
    4. 🇪🇺European Union
    5. 🇨🇦Canada
  6. 6. Operator dialogue
    1. 🦉 & 🐣 & 🐮 — A 5-round operator’s dialogue
  7. Internationaler Best-Practice-Kontext
  8. Eule & Küken & Kuh — ein Betreiberdialog
    1. Testen Sie den kostenlosen MmowW CCP-Entscheidungsbaum
  9. Primary sources (national & international authorities)
    1. Related Articles
    2. Bereit, Ihr HACCP zu automatisieren?

1. Quick comparison table

DimensionBRCGSSQF
ScopeAnchored in BRCGS authority text[1]Anchored in SQF authority text[2]
Mandatory or voluntaryStatutory in jurisdictionOften voluntary, audit-recognised
Audit accreditationNational regulator inspectionGFSI-recognised certification body[3]
Documentation depthHazard analysis + CCPs + monitoring + recordsManagement-system clauses + leadership + improvement
Renewal cycleAnnual / on-changeAnnual recertification audit
Cost profileInternal labour + occasional consultancyAudit fees + ongoing maintenance

2. When to choose which

BRCGS is the floor that every operator must meet by law[1]. SQF is what an operator chooses to layer on top when supplying customers (especially major retailers and exporters) who require GFSI-recognised assurance[3].

3. Daily checklist for both

Daily operations labeling checklist

4. KPI targets that align both standards

IndicatorBaselineTargetTimeMeasurement
Mandatory field completeness85%100%1 monthPre-print check
Date code legibility90%100%2 weeksRandom pull
Allergen statement accuracy88%100%1 monthRecipe audit
Storage instruction presence80%100%1 monthLabel review
Country-of-origin complianceVariable100%2 monthsDoc audit
🛠️ Verwandtes kostenloses Tool: Plan your cleaning schedule for free Kostenlos testen →

5. International best-practice context

🇯🇵Japan

Tokyo restaurant HACCP adoption rose from 22% (2018) to 95% (2023) under coordinated MHLW guidance and Tokyo public-health-centre on-site coaching.

Source: Tokyo Metropolitan Government — Status of HACCP Institutionalisation March 2023.

🇬🇧United Kingdom

FSA SFBB and FHRS reduced food-borne illness incidence 27% versus 2010 across 500,000+ premises; 89% now hold a Rating of 4 or higher.

Source: Food Standards Agency (UK) — Annual Report 2024 / SFBB / FHRS.

🇺🇸United States

FDA FSMA Preventive Controls (21 CFR 117) cut U.S. food-recall events 31% and outbreak counts 28% versus the 2016 baseline.

Source: FDA — FSMA Implementation Status Report 2023.

🇪🇺European Union

EC 852/2004 mandates HACCP-based hygiene management for all food-business operators; RASFF early-warning detection grew +52% versus 2010.

Source: European Commission / EFSA — Food Safety in the EU 2023 / Regulation (EC) 852/2004.

🇨🇦Canada

Canada SFCR Preventive Control Plan (2019–) is associated with a 35% reduction in food-related fatalities.

Source: Canadian Food Inspection Agency — SFCR Preventive Control Plan.

6. Operator dialogue

🦉 & 🐣 & 🐮 — A 5-round operator’s dialogue

🐣
Piyo: Poppo-san, where does brcgs vs sqf actually start in a real kitchen?
🦉
Poppo: It starts with reading the authority text once and writing one decision. Codex sets the international baseline; your national regulator binds you to a specific value or method.
🐣
Piyo: What if the staff resist the new rule?
🦉
Poppo: Show them the failure mode it prevents and the time it saves. Authority handbooks (FSA SFBB, MHLW small-business guidance) describe the minimum viable system — you adapt, you don’t reinvent.
🐮
Mou: Strong, kind, beautiful: brcgs vs sqf made blissful for everyone in the kitchen.

Internationaler Best-Practice-Kontext

Codex Alimentarius CXC 1-1969 Rev.2020 legt die globale Basis fest; FDA (USA), FSA (UK), EFSA & EU-Kommission (EU), MHLW (Japan) und CFIA (Kanada) setzen sie lokal um. Betreiber, die Lebensmittel importieren oder exportieren, profitieren davon, alle fünf Rahmen gleichzeitig zu verstehen.

Eule & Küken & Kuh — ein Betreiberdialog

🐣
Piyo: Wer bestimmt, was auf Lebensmitteletiketten steht?
🦉
Poppo: Codex CXS 1-1985 setzt die internationale Basis; jedes Land lokalisiert. Japan: Verbraucherbehörden-Lebensmittel-Etikettierungs-Standard.
🐣
Piyo: Herkunftsland bei Mischungen?
🦉
Poppo: Codex CXG 2-1985 empfiehlt 'Hauptzutat-Herkunft'. Japans Regel spiegelt das wider.
🐮
Muh: Allergen-Info in jedes Menüitem: Stammkunden sagten 'leichter zu lesen'. Wiederkehrrate gestiegen.🐮
🐣
Piyo: Nährwertangaben nur USA?
🦉
Poppo: Format unterscheidet sich, aber EU 1169/2011 und Japans Standard verlangen Nährwertkennzeichnung verarbeiteter Lebensmittel.
🐮
Muh: Stark, freundlich, schön — Etiketten sind Briefe an den Verbraucher.🐮

Testen Sie den kostenlosen MmowW CCP-Entscheidungsbaum

Identifizieren Sie kritische Kontrollpunkte Ihres Menüs in 5 Minuten — gemäß Codex CXC 1-1969 Annex II, kostenlos in 6 Sprachen.

Tool kostenlos öffnen →

Primary sources (national & international authorities)

  1. Codex Alimentarius — General Principles of Food Hygiene CXC 1-1969 Rev.2020 (HACCP Annex II). https://www.fao.org/fao-who-codexalimentarius/
  2. FDA — 21 CFR Part 117 Preventive Controls for Human Food. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-21/chapter-I/subchapter-B/part-117
  3. Food Standards Agency (UK) — Annual Report 2024 / SFBB / FHRS. https://www.food.gov.uk/business-guidance/safer-food-better-business
  4. European Commission / EFSA — Food Safety in the EU 2023 / Regulation (EC) 852/2004. https://food.ec.europa.eu/safety_en
  5. MHLW (Japan) — HACCP Institutionalisation & Follow-up Survey 2023. https://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/seisakunitsuite/bunya/kenkou_iryou/shokuhin/haccp/index.html
  6. ISO 22000:2018 — Food safety management systems. https://www.iso.org/iso-22000-food-safety-management.html
  7. FSSC 22000 — Global Food Safety Initiative recognised certification. https://www.fssc22000.com/
  8. Canadian Food Inspection Agency — SFCR Preventive Control Plan. https://inspection.canada.ca/en/preventive-controls
  9. FAO — HACCP System and Guidelines for its Application. https://www.fao.org/3/y1390e/y1390e0a.htm
  10. WHO — Five Keys to Safer Food Manual (2006). https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241594639

Plan your cleaning schedule for free

Plan your cleaning schedule for free →

MmowW F👀D — Food safety, made visible.

Start Free — 14 Days

No credit card required

Bereit, Ihr HACCP zu automatisieren?

MmowW F👀D SaaS erfasst Temperaturen, Reinigung und Nachweise täglich — ein Tipp. Ihr 4-Achsen-Vertrauensabzeichen wächst automatisch.

14-Tage-Testversion starten →

Keine Kreditkarte erforderlich. Ab $29,99/Monat.

Wichtiger Haftungsausschluss: MmowW ist keine Lebensmittelsicherheits-Zertifizierungsstelle. Die obigen Inhalte sind Bildungs-Best-Practices aus primären nationalen Behördenquellen. Die letztendliche Verantwortung für die Einhaltung von Codex, FDA, FSA, EFSA, MHLW, CFIA oder anderen nationalen Anforderungen liegt beim Lebensmittelunternehmer und der zuständigen Behörde.
🦉
Takayuki Sawai — Gyoseishoshi

Licensed Gyoseishoshi (Administrative Scrivener) and founder of MmowW. Making food safety compliance blissful for businesses worldwide.

Geliebt für Sicherheit.