Updated 2026-05-02

How to Handle UK Collective Redundancy (20+ Employees)

Quick Answer: UK Employment Law: How to Handle UK Collective Redundancy (20+ Employees). Complete guide with 2026 legal requirements and procedures. | MmowW Scrib🐮. The collective redundancy duties under section 188 of TULRCA 1992 are triggered where an employer proposes to dismiss as redundant:
Table of Contents

Collective redundancy is one of the most heavily regulated processes in UK employment law. When a UK private limited company (Ltd) proposes to dismiss 20 or more employees at a single establishment within a 90-day period, the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 (TULRCA 1992) imposes specific consultation obligations, notification duties to government, and minimum timelines. This how-to walks through the process step by step, with the procedural triggers and statutory hooks that determine compliance.

Step 1 — Confirm the Trigger Threshold

The collective redundancy duties under section 188 of TULRCA 1992 are triggered where an employer proposes to dismiss as redundant:

“Establishment” was clarified by USDAW v Ethel Austin Ltd (Woolworths) [2015] EUECJ C-80/14 — the unit of organisational structure to which workers are assigned, not the entire company. Multi-site businesses must count site-by-site.

Once the threshold is met:

Primary source: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1992/52/section/188

Step 2 — Define the “Pool”

Identify the group of employees from which redundancies will be selected — the selection pool. The pool definition is fact-sensitive and case law (Capita Hartshead v Byard [2012] IRLR 814) emphasises a thoughtful approach. Wrong pool definition = unfair dismissal exposure.

Step 3 — Identify Appropriate Representatives

Section 188(1B) requires consultation with “appropriate representatives”:

If electing representatives, the employer must:

Failure to elect properly invalidates consultation and triggers protective awards.

Step 4 — Provide Section 188(4) Information

Section 188(4) of TULRCA 1992 requires the employer to provide written information to representatives before consultation begins:

Step 5 — File HR1 with the Secretary of State

Under section 193 of TULRCA 1992 and the Employment Protection (Handling of Redundancies) Regulations 2010 (SI 2010/2706), the employer must notify the Secretary of State on form HR1:

HR1 is filed with the Insolvency Service Redundancy Payments Service. Failure to notify is a criminal offence punishable by an unlimited fine (post-Sentencing Act 2020).

Reference: https://www.gov.uk/redundancy-payments-service-employer-guidance

Step 6 — Conduct Meaningful Consultation

Section 188(2) of TULRCA 1992 specifies that consultation must include considering:

Consultation must be undertaken with a view to reaching agreement. It is not a tick-box. Tribunals look at:

Average duration in practice: 4–6 weeks for 20–99; 7–10 weeks for 100+ (allowing buffer above statutory minimum).

Step 7 — Run Individual Consultation in Parallel

Collective consultation does not displace individual consultation. Each affected employee must also be:

Step 8 — Apply Fair Selection Criteria

Selection criteria must be:

LIFO (Last In First Out) on its own can be indirectly age-discriminatory and is rarely safe in 2026.

Step 9 — Consider and Offer Suitable Alternative Employment

Section 138 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 preserves continuity if a suitable alternative role is offered and accepted. Consider:

Refusal of “suitable” alternative employment can disqualify the employee from a redundancy payment under section 141 ERA 1996.

Try it free →

Step 10 — Make Redundancies and Pay Statutory Amounts

Once consultation is complete:

Step 11 — Issue P45 and Final Payslip

Tax PILON (payment in lieu of notice) under Finance (No.2) Act 2017 Part 9 — all PILON now subject to income tax and NICs (the PENP calculation).

Step 12 — Maintain Records

Under section 21 of the Limitation Act 1980 (and ACAS guidance), retain consultation records, HR1 receipt, scoring matrices, and individual files for 6 years. They are essential evidence in any tribunal claim.

Failure Consequences — Protective Awards

Under section 189 of TULRCA 1992, failure to consult triggers a protective award of up to 90 days’ actual pay per affected employee (capped only by the actual pay, not the statutory week’s pay cap). For a 50-employee redundancy with 4-week salaries averaging £3,000, this can mean £540,000+ in protective awards.

The Employment Rights Bill 2025 proposes to double the maximum protective award in certain circumstances and to extend the trigger by removing the “single establishment” limit, applying instead to “across the business”.

Common Mistakes — Gyoseishoshi View

MistakeConsequenceFix
Setting deadline before consultation period endsSham consultation; protective awardCalendar consultation start to “earliest dismissal date”
Treating multiple sites as one establishment (or vice versa)HR1 deficient; consultation flawedApply Woolworths CJEU/EAT analysis
Skipping HR1Criminal offenceFile 30/45 days ahead
Using subjective selection criteriaUnfair dismissalUse objective, verifiable criteria
Forgetting agency workers in s.188(4)(g)Information defectiveDisclose agency information
Pillow-talk consultationNot “meaningful”Engage genuinely with representatives

RRA 2025 / ERB 2025 — Recent and Coming Changes

Conclusion — Process is the Outcome

Collective redundancy in the UK is judged on process more than outcome. Tribunals readily accept that businesses need to restructure; what they punish is the failure to consult genuinely, notify on HR1, apply fair criteria, and deliver statutory entitlements correctly. The procedural choreography under TULRCA 1992 sections 188–193 leaves no room for shortcuts.

A Gyoseishoshi cannot represent UK employers in employment tribunals or file HR1 directly. Scrib🐮 produces the documentary architecture: section 188(4) information packs, employee representative election templates, selection-criteria scoring frameworks, and individual consultation correspondence sets.


Create your collective redundancy documentation with Scrib🐮

¥22,000/month pass for unlimited access to all 18 document types across 7 countries. Start Free Preview →


Disclaimer

Legal information, not legal advice. MmowW Scrib🐮 is operated by a licensed Gyoseishoshi (行政書士) office in Japan. We are not UK solicitors.

Sources

Estimate your formation cost

Estimate your formation cost →

MmowW Scrib🐮 — Company registration, made clear.

Start Free — 14 Days

No credit card required

🦉
Takayuki Sawai — Gyoseishoshi

Licensed Gyoseishoshi (Administrative Scrivener) and founder of MmowW. Making company registration clear for entrepreneurs worldwide.

Loved for Safety.