MmowW› Bibliothèque Food › compare-brcgs-vs-sqf
COMPARISON · PUBLIÉ 2026-04-28 Updated 2026-04-28

BRCGS vs SQF — Labeling Comparison

A side-by-side comparison of BRCGS and SQF in the context of labeling.

Quick Answer

A side-by-side comparison of BRCGS and SQF in the context of labeling.

📑 Table des matières
  1. 1. Quick comparison table
  2. 2. When to choose which
  3. 3. Daily checklist for both
  4. 4. KPI targets that align both standards
  5. 5. International best-practice context
    1. 🇯🇵Japan
    2. 🇬🇧United Kingdom
    3. 🇺🇸United States
    4. 🇪🇺European Union
    5. 🇨🇦Canada
  6. 6. Operator dialogue
    1. 🦉 & 🐣 & 🐮 — A 5-round operator’s dialogue
  7. Contexte des bonnes pratiques internationales
  8. Hibou & Poussin & Vache — dialogue d'exploitant
    1. Essayez l'arbre décisionnel CCP gratuit de MmowW
  9. Primary sources (national & international authorities)
    1. Related Articles
    2. Prêt à automatiser votre HACCP ?

1. Quick comparison table

DimensionBRCGSSQF
ScopeAnchored in BRCGS authority text[1]Anchored in SQF authority text[2]
Mandatory or voluntaryStatutory in jurisdictionOften voluntary, audit-recognised
Audit accreditationNational regulator inspectionGFSI-recognised certification body[3]
Documentation depthHazard analysis + CCPs + monitoring + recordsManagement-system clauses + leadership + improvement
Renewal cycleAnnual / on-changeAnnual recertification audit
Cost profileInternal labour + occasional consultancyAudit fees + ongoing maintenance

2. When to choose which

BRCGS is the floor that every operator must meet by law[1]. SQF is what an operator chooses to layer on top when supplying customers (especially major retailers and exporters) who require GFSI-recognised assurance[3].

3. Daily checklist for both

Daily operations labeling checklist

4. KPI targets that align both standards

IndicatorBaselineTargetTimeMeasurement
Mandatory field completeness85%100%1 monthPre-print check
Date code legibility90%100%2 weeksRandom pull
Allergen statement accuracy88%100%1 monthRecipe audit
Storage instruction presence80%100%1 monthLabel review
Country-of-origin complianceVariable100%2 monthsDoc audit
🛠️ Outil gratuit associé: Plan your cleaning schedule for free Essayer gratuitement →

5. International best-practice context

🇯🇵Japan

Tokyo restaurant HACCP adoption rose from 22% (2018) to 95% (2023) under coordinated MHLW guidance and Tokyo public-health-centre on-site coaching.

Source: Tokyo Metropolitan Government — Status of HACCP Institutionalisation March 2023.

🇬🇧United Kingdom

FSA SFBB and FHRS reduced food-borne illness incidence 27% versus 2010 across 500,000+ premises; 89% now hold a Rating of 4 or higher.

Source: Food Standards Agency (UK) — Annual Report 2024 / SFBB / FHRS.

🇺🇸United States

FDA FSMA Preventive Controls (21 CFR 117) cut U.S. food-recall events 31% and outbreak counts 28% versus the 2016 baseline.

Source: FDA — FSMA Implementation Status Report 2023.

🇪🇺European Union

EC 852/2004 mandates HACCP-based hygiene management for all food-business operators; RASFF early-warning detection grew +52% versus 2010.

Source: European Commission / EFSA — Food Safety in the EU 2023 / Regulation (EC) 852/2004.

🇨🇦Canada

Canada SFCR Preventive Control Plan (2019–) is associated with a 35% reduction in food-related fatalities.

Source: Canadian Food Inspection Agency — SFCR Preventive Control Plan.

6. Operator dialogue

🦉 & 🐣 & 🐮 — A 5-round operator’s dialogue

🐣
Piyo: Poppo-san, where does brcgs vs sqf actually start in a real kitchen?
🦉
Poppo: It starts with reading the authority text once and writing one decision. Codex sets the international baseline; your national regulator binds you to a specific value or method.
🐣
Piyo: What if the staff resist the new rule?
🦉
Poppo: Show them the failure mode it prevents and the time it saves. Authority handbooks (FSA SFBB, MHLW small-business guidance) describe the minimum viable system — you adapt, you don’t reinvent.
🐮
Mou: Strong, kind, beautiful: brcgs vs sqf made blissful for everyone in the kitchen.

Contexte des bonnes pratiques internationales

Codex Alimentarius CXC 1-1969 Rev.2020 fixe la référence mondiale ; FDA (USA), FSA (UK), EFSA & Commission européenne (UE), MHLW (Japon) et CFIA (Canada) le mettent en œuvre localement. Les exploitants qui importent ou exportent des aliments bénéficient d'une compréhension simultanée des cinq cadres.

Hibou & Poussin & Vache — dialogue d'exploitant

🐣
Piyo: Qui décide ce qui figure sur les étiquettes alimentaires ?
🦉
Poppo: Codex CXS 1-1985 fixe la base internationale; chaque pays localise. Japon : Norme d'Étiquetage Alimentaire CAA.
🐣
Piyo: Pays d'origine pour mélanges ?
🦉
Poppo: Codex CXG 2-1985 recommande 'origine ingrédient principal'. Règle japonaise miroir.
🐮
Meuh: Allergènes sur chaque menu : clients fidèles ont dit 'plus facile à lire'. Taux de retour augmenté.🐮
🐣
Piyo: Tableau nutritionnel seulement aux USA ?
🦉
Poppo: Format diffère, mais EU 1169/2011 et standard japonais exigent étiquetage nutritionnel des aliments transformés.
🐮
Meuh: Fort, bienveillant, beau — les étiquettes sont des lettres au consommateur.🐮

Essayez l'arbre décisionnel CCP gratuit de MmowW

Identifiez les points critiques de votre menu en 5 minutes — aligné sur Codex CXC 1-1969 Annexe II, gratuit en 6 langues.

Ouvrir l'outil gratuit →

Primary sources (national & international authorities)

  1. Codex Alimentarius — General Principles of Food Hygiene CXC 1-1969 Rev.2020 (HACCP Annex II). https://www.fao.org/fao-who-codexalimentarius/
  2. FDA — 21 CFR Part 117 Preventive Controls for Human Food. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-21/chapter-I/subchapter-B/part-117
  3. Food Standards Agency (UK) — Annual Report 2024 / SFBB / FHRS. https://www.food.gov.uk/business-guidance/safer-food-better-business
  4. European Commission / EFSA — Food Safety in the EU 2023 / Regulation (EC) 852/2004. https://food.ec.europa.eu/safety_en
  5. MHLW (Japan) — HACCP Institutionalisation & Follow-up Survey 2023. https://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/seisakunitsuite/bunya/kenkou_iryou/shokuhin/haccp/index.html
  6. ISO 22000:2018 — Food safety management systems. https://www.iso.org/iso-22000-food-safety-management.html
  7. FSSC 22000 — Global Food Safety Initiative recognised certification. https://www.fssc22000.com/
  8. Canadian Food Inspection Agency — SFCR Preventive Control Plan. https://inspection.canada.ca/en/preventive-controls
  9. FAO — HACCP System and Guidelines for its Application. https://www.fao.org/3/y1390e/y1390e0a.htm
  10. WHO — Five Keys to Safer Food Manual (2006). https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241594639

Plan your cleaning schedule for free

Plan your cleaning schedule for free →

MmowW F👀D — Food safety, made visible.

Start Free — 14 Days

No credit card required

Prêt à automatiser votre HACCP ?

MmowW F👀D SaaS enregistre températures, nettoyage et preuves chaque jour — un clic. Votre badge de confiance 4 axes grandit automatiquement.

Démarrer l'essai gratuit de 14 jours →

Aucune carte bancaire requise. À partir de 29,99 $/mois.

Avertissement important : MmowW n'est pas un organisme de certification en sécurité alimentaire. Le contenu ci-dessus est un écrit pédagogique de bonnes pratiques distillé depuis des sources primaires d'autorités nationales. La responsabilité finale de la conformité au Codex, FDA, FSA, EFSA, MHLW, CFIA ou à toute autre exigence nationale incombe à l'exploitant alimentaire et à l'autorité compétente.
🦉
Takayuki Sawai — Gyoseishoshi

Licensed Gyoseishoshi (Administrative Scrivener) and founder of MmowW. Making food safety compliance blissful for businesses worldwide.

Aimé pour la sécurité.