Deep dive · United States · company
Last verified: 2026-05-02 · 1,430 words · 6 government sources
US C-Corp vs S-Corp vs LLC: Tax and Liability Comparison
Table of Contents
- 1. Liability Shield — Same in All Three
- 2. Federal Tax Treatment — Sharp Differences
- 3. Self-Employment Tax — The S-Corp Advantage
- 4. Ownership Rules — S-Corp Is Restrictive
- 5. Multiple Stock Classes — C-Corp Wins
- 6. Loss Pass-Through
- 7. QSBS — C-Corp’s Hidden Advantage
- 8. State Filing and Maintenance
- 9. Conversion Among Entities
- 10. Decision Framework
- 11. Common Errors
- 12. Quick Reference Table
- Create your C-Corp, S-Corp, or LLC formation documents with Scrib🐮
- Disclaimer
- Sources
- Related Articles
- Multi-Country Documents with Scrib🐮
- Disclaimer
The three most common US business entities — C-Corporation, S-Corporation, and Limited Liability Company (LLC) — share one feature (limited liability) but diverge sharply on taxation, ownership rules, and growth optionality. This deep-dive compares them under the Internal Revenue Code (Subchapters C and S, IRC §§11, 1361, 1362) and standard state corporate / LLC statutes.
1. Liability Shield — Same in All Three
All three entities provide limited liability for their owners under the relevant state statute:
- C-Corp / S-Corp — shareholders not liable for corporate debts beyond invested capital (e.g., DGCL §102, MBCA §6.22).
- LLC — members not liable for LLC debts (e.g., 6 Del.C. §18-303, Wyo. Stat. §17-29-303).
The shield is pierced in all three only by extraordinary circumstances (commingling, undercapitalization, fraud). Choice of entity does not, by itself, make the shield stronger or weaker.
2. Federal Tax Treatment — Sharp Differences
| Entity | Federal Entity Tax | Owner Tax |
|---|---|---|
| C-Corp | 21% flat under IRC §11 | Personal tax on dividends (qualified rate 0/15/20%) — double taxation |
| S-Corp | None (pass-through under IRC §1366) | Personal tax on K-1 income; W-2 wages subject to FICA |
| LLC (default) | None (pass-through; partnership for multi-member, disregarded for single-member) | Personal tax + self-employment tax on net income |
The “double taxation” of C-Corps: Profits taxed at the entity level (21%), then dividend distributions taxed again on shareholders. Top combined federal rate: ~21% + 23.8% (qualified dividend + Net Investment Income Tax) = ~39.8% on distributed profits.
Pass-through avoids the entity-level tax. S-Corps and LLCs (default) pass income directly to owners, who pay personal income tax once.
3. Self-Employment Tax — The S-Corp Advantage
Under IRC §1402, a sole-proprietor LLC owner pays 15.3% self-employment tax (FICA) on all net earnings from self-employment, capped only by the Social Security wage base for the SS portion.
An S-Corp owner-employee pays FICA only on their W-2 wages. Distributions of remaining profit (K-1 income) are not subject to SE tax — this is the S-Corp’s signature tax advantage.
Example: Solo consultant earning USD 150,000.
| Structure | FICA Tax (15.3%) |
|---|---|
| LLC default | $150,000 × 15.3% = $22,950 (subject to wage base caps) |
| S-Corp with $80K reasonable salary | $80,000 × 15.3% = $12,240 (only on W-2 wages); $70,000 distribution not SE-taxed |
| Savings | ~$10,710/year |
IRS reasonableness requirement: Under IRC §1366(d) and IRS audit guidance, S-Corp owner-employee wages must be “reasonable compensation” for services rendered. Setting an artificially low salary to maximise distributions invites audit and reclassification. Use industry comparables (Glassdoor, BLS data).
4. Ownership Rules — S-Corp Is Restrictive
Under IRC §1361(b), an S-Corp must satisfy:
- ≤100 shareholders (married couples count as one);
- All shareholders must be US citizens or US-resident individuals — no non-resident aliens;
- Only certain types of entities as shareholders (estates, certain trusts, qualified retirement plans, certain charities);
- Only one class of stock (voting differences allowed; economic preferences not);
- A US domestic entity.
For foreign founders: S-Corp election is unavailable if any shareholder is a non-resident alien. C-Corps and LLCs have no such restriction.
5. Multiple Stock Classes — C-Corp Wins
| Entity | Stock Classes |
|---|---|
| C-Corp | Multiple classes allowed (common, preferred, multiple preferred series) — under DGCL §151 |
| S-Corp | One class only — under IRC §1361(b)(1)(D) |
| LLC | Multiple member classes via Operating Agreement |
Why VCs require C-Corp: Venture capital deals always involve preferred stock with liquidation preferences, conversion rights, anti-dilution protection, and dividend preferences. Only C-Corps support this complexity natively. S-Corps cannot have preferred stock; LLCs theoretically can have multiple member classes but VCs find LLC structures unwieldy.
6. Loss Pass-Through
| Entity | Loss Treatment |
|---|---|
| C-Corp | NOL carried forward at entity (post-2017 NOL: 80% taxable income limit, no carryback) |
| S-Corp | Pass-through to shareholders — limited by basis under IRC §1366(d) |
| LLC (default) | Pass-through to members — limited by basis and at-risk rules |
For unprofitable startups burning capital, S-Corp and LLC pass-through let owners deduct losses against other income, lowering personal tax bills. C-Corp losses sit at the entity until profitability — useless to founders’ personal taxes.
7. QSBS — C-Corp’s Hidden Advantage
Under IRC §1202 (Qualified Small Business Stock):
- C-Corp shareholders holding stock for 5+ years in a “qualified small business” may exclude up to USD 10 million (or 10x basis, whichever greater) per shareholder from federal capital gains tax on sale.
QSBS is C-Corp only — not available to LLCs or S-Corps. For founders contemplating a 5+ year hold and exit, this can be a USD 2.4M+ tax savings (federal long-term capital gains otherwise 23.8%).
This is one of the strongest reasons VC-bound founders incorporate as C-Corp from day 1.
8. State Filing and Maintenance
| Entity | Annual Maintenance |
|---|---|
| C-Corp | Annual report (state) + corporate income tax return (Form 1120) |
| S-Corp | Annual report (state) + Form 1120-S + state pass-through return |
| LLC | Annual report (state varies) + Form 1065 (multi) or Schedule C (single-member disregarded) |
LLCs typically have lighter governance requirements (no required board meetings, no required minutes for state purposes) than corporations.
9. Conversion Among Entities
| From | To | Mechanism |
|---|---|---|
| LLC | C-Corp | Form 8832 (entity classification election) — clean conversion |
| LLC | S-Corp | Form 8832 + Form 2553 |
| C-Corp | S-Corp | Form 2553 (election) within 75 days of fiscal year start |
| C-Corp | LLC | Statutory conversion under state law (rarely done due to gain recognition) |
| S-Corp | C-Corp | Revoke S election (IRC §1362(d)) |
Most founders form initially as LLC for simplicity, then convert to C-Corp before the first VC round. Conversion is straightforward but timing matters for QSBS holding period (the 5-year clock restarts on the C-Corp formation date).
10. Decision Framework
Choose LLC (default pass-through) if:
- Real estate holding company.
- Solo consulting business under USD 80K profit.
- Online business with one or two owners.
- Want simplicity, low maintenance, pass-through.
Choose LLC + S-Corp election if:
- Solo operating business consistently profitable (USD 80K+ net).
- Owner is US citizen / resident.
- Willing to run payroll and pay reasonable W-2 wages.
Choose S-Corp (direct) if:
- All owners US persons.
- Single class of stock acceptable.
- Looking for pass-through with W-2 wage flexibility.
Choose C-Corp if:
- Planning VC fundraising.
- ESOP / employee stock options.
- Foreign founders or institutional investors.
- 5+ year exit horizon (QSBS under IRC §1202).
- IPO path.
11. Common Errors
| Error | Why It Fails |
|---|---|
| Foreign founder elects S-Corp | Disqualifies under IRC §1361(b)(1)(C) — non-resident alien shareholder |
| C-Corp with no profit and salary | Wastes 21% rate; LLC pass-through would have been better |
| S-Corp with unreasonably low wages | IRS audit risk; potential reclassification |
| LLC with VC investor | VC declines or requires conversion to C-Corp |
| LLC for foreign founder + US partner | LLC works; S-Corp election unavailable |
12. Quick Reference Table
| Feature | C-Corp | S-Corp | LLC (default) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Federal entity tax | 21% | 0% | 0% |
| Double taxation | Yes | No | No |
| Owner restrictions | None | US persons, ≤100 | None |
| Stock classes | Multiple | One | Multiple member classes |
| SE tax savings | N/A | Yes (with reasonable wages) | No |
| QSBS eligible | Yes | No | No |
| VC-friendly | Yes | No | No |
| Loss pass-through | No | Yes | Yes |
| Governance burden | High | Medium | Low |
| Best for | VC-bound startups | Profitable solo US business | Holding companies, real estate, online |
Create your C-Corp, S-Corp, or LLC formation documents with Scrib🐮
¥22,000/month pass for unlimited access to all 18 document types across 7 countries. Start Free Preview →
Disclaimer
Legal information, not legal advice. MmowW Scrib🐮 is operated by a licensed Gyoseishoshi (行政書士) office in Japan. We are not US attorneys or CPAs.
Sources
- Internal Revenue Code §11 (corporate tax) — https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/11
- IRC §1361 (S-Corp eligibility) — https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/1361
- IRC §1362 (S-Corp election) — https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/1362
- IRC §1202 (Qualified Small Business Stock) — https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/1202
- IRS Form 2553 (S-Corp election) — https://www.irs.gov/forms-pubs/about-form-2553
- IRS Form 8832 (entity classification election) — https://www.irs.gov/forms-pubs/about-form-8832
Estimate your formation cost
Estimate your formation cost →MmowW Scrib🐮 — Company registration, made clear.
Start Free — 14 DaysNo credit card required
Disclaimer
Legal information, not legal advice. MmowW Scrib🐮 is operated by a licensed Gyoseishoshi (行政書士) office in Japan. We are not solicitors, barristers, attorneys, avocats, notaries, or licensed legal practitioners in any jurisdiction outside Japan. For binding legal advice, consult a qualified practitioner admitted in the relevant jurisdiction.
Loved for Safety.