Cross-border
Last verified: 2026-05-02 · 1,700 words · 11 government sources
Probation, Trial Period, Période d’Essai: 7-Country Comparison
Last verified: 2026-05-02
The early-employment “probation” or “trial” mechanism is one of the most miscoded clauses in cross-border HR. France’s période d’essai is explicitly statute-bounded. New Zealand’s 90-day trial period (ERA s.67A) is restricted to small employers and excludes grievance claims. The UK has no statutory probation but a 2-year unfair-dismissal threshold. Australia has no statutory probation but unfair dismissal protection at 6 months. This guide explains how each works, the maximum length, and the legal effect of dismissal during the period.
The early-employment "probation" or "trial" mechanism is one of the most miscoded clauses in cross-border HR.
📑 Table of Contents
- Quick Answer (TL;DR)
- Comparison Table at a Glance
- Country-by-Country Deep Dive
- France — Période d’Essai (L.1221-19 to L.1221-26)
- New Zealand — 90-Day Trial Period (ERA s.67A)
- Australia — No Statutory Probation, NES Threshold
- United Kingdom — No Statutory Probation, ERA 2-Year Threshold
- Canada (Ontario) — ESA First-3-Months No Notice
- United States — At-Will + Introductory Period Common
- Decision Framework / Q&A
- Common Pitfalls (Gyoseishoshi View)
- Conclusion
- Multi-Country Documents with Scrib🐮
- Disclaimer
- Sources
Quick Answer (TL;DR)
- France: Période d’essai — 2 to 8 months by category, statutory cap, single renewal under L.1221-21.
- NZ: 90-day trial period only for sub-20-employee employers (ERA s.67A); excludes personal grievance for unjustified dismissal.
- Australia: No statutory probation; unfair-dismissal protection begins at 6 months (12 for small biz).
- UK: No statutory probation; unfair-dismissal protection at 2 years (reform pending day-one).
- Canada: ESA “first 3 months” allows termination without notice; common law still allows wrongful-dismissal claim.
- US: At-will default; “introductory period” purely contractual.
Comparison Table at a Glance
| Country | Statutory probation? | Maximum length | Effect on dismissal claims | Renewal allowed? |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| France | YES (Code L.1221-19) | Cadre: 4+4=8 mo; Agent maîtrise: 3+3=6 mo; Employé: 2+2=4 mo | Reduces protection during; immediate termination on notice | Yes, once, must be CCN-allowed |
| New Zealand | YES (ERA s.67A) | 90 days from start | Excludes personal-grievance for unjustified dismissal | No |
| Australia | NO | None | Unfair dismissal kicks in at 6 mo (12 mo small biz) | n/a |
| UK | NO | None (purely contractual) | Unfair dismissal at 2 yrs (reform pending) | n/a |
| Canada (ON) | NO statutory | None statutory | ESA first 3 mo no notice required; common law still applies | n/a |
| US | NO | None statutory | At-will default already permits termination | n/a |
Country-by-Country Deep Dive
France — Période d’Essai (L.1221-19 to L.1221-26)
Statute: Code du travail L.1221-19 to L.1221-26.
The période d’essai is the only fully codified probation system in the seven countries.
Initial duration cap (L.1221-19):
- Ouvriers and employés: 2 months maximum.
- Agents de maîtrise and techniciens: 3 months maximum.
- Cadres: 4 months maximum.
Renewal (L.1221-21):
- Allowed once if the convention collective expressly permits.
- Total (initial + renewal) cannot exceed:
- 4 months for ouvriers / employés.
- 6 months for agents de maîtrise.
- 8 months for cadres.
Notice during période d’essai (L.1221-25, L.1221-26):
- Less than 8 days: 24 hours.
- 8 days to 1 month: 48 hours.
- After 1 month: 2 weeks.
- After 3 months: 1 month.
The notice during période d’essai counts forward — if remaining trial is shorter than required notice, the period is automatically extended.
Dismissal during période d’essai. No requirement to give reason; no procedure de licenciement. But cannot be discriminatory or in bad faith — Cour de cassation jurisprudence since 2008.
Source: https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/codes/article_lc/LEGIARTI000006901075
New Zealand — 90-Day Trial Period (ERA s.67A)
Statute: Employment Relations Act 2000 ss.67A–67H.
The 90-day trial period is highly restricted:
Eligibility (s.67A(1)):
- Employer must have fewer than 20 employees as at the date the agreement is entered.
- Trial must be specified in writing in the IEA.
- IEA must be signed before the start of work.
Effect:
- Employer may dismiss during the trial without grievance claim for unjustified dismissal (s.103A).
- Employee retains other claims: discrimination, harassment, breach of good faith.
- Notice as per IEA must still be given (no PILON allowed).
Probation period (separate, s.67):
- Available to all employers regardless of size.
- Does NOT exclude personal-grievance rights.
- Allows employer to assess fit; dismissal still requires fair process under s.103A.
Source: https://www.employment.govt.nz/starting-employment/trial-and-probationary-periods/
Australia — No Statutory Probation, NES Threshold
Statute: Fair Work Act 2009 s.382, s.383.
Australia does not have a statutory probation period. Instead, the unfair-dismissal protection (Part 3-2) only applies after the employee has completed the minimum employment period:
- 6 months for employers with 15+ employees.
- 12 months for small business (<15 employees).
During the minimum employment period, employer may terminate without unfair-dismissal exposure (subject to general protections, anti-discrimination law).
A contractual probation clause is enforceable as a notice-period reduction during early employment — many employers use a 3 or 6-month probation period that mirrors the NES threshold.
Source: https://www.fairwork.gov.au/employment-conditions/probation-periods
United Kingdom — No Statutory Probation, ERA 2-Year Threshold
Statute: Employment Rights Act 1996 s.108 (qualifying period).
Unfair-dismissal protection currently requires 2 years’ continuous service (with exceptions: discrimination, whistleblowing, asserting statutory rights — day-one protections).
A “probationary period” is purely contractual. Employer typically reserves a shorter notice (1 week vs 1 month) during probation. Length is at the employer’s discretion — 3 to 6 months is common.
Reform pending. The Employment Rights Bill 2024–25 (in Parliament 2026) is set to remove the 2-year threshold and introduce a “statutory probationary period” with day-one unfair dismissal protection thereafter. Watch for Royal Assent.
Source: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1996/18/section/108
Canada (Ontario) — ESA First-3-Months No Notice
Statute: ESA 2000 s.54, s.55.
Ontario ESA does not codify probation, but s.54 exempts employer from notice requirements during the first 3 months of employment. After 3 months, ESA s.57 minimum notice applies.
Common law overlay. Even within the first 3 months, common-law wrongful dismissal can apply if the contract does not validly limit notice. A “probation clause” in the contract that excludes Bardal common-law notice must be carefully drafted to be enforceable.
Source: https://www.ontario.ca/laws/statute/00e41
United States — At-Will + Introductory Period Common
Statute: Common law of contracts; FLSA.
Most US employers describe an “introductory” or “orientation” period of 60–90 days. This has no statutory effect because at-will already permits termination at any time.
The introductory period is mainly used:
- To delay benefits eligibility (health insurance after 90 days, retirement plan after 1 year).
- To signal probationary fit assessment.
- To distinguish performance reviews.
State exceptions:
- Montana — Wrongful Discharge from Employment Act requires “good cause” after probationary period (default 12 months); employer may set probation up to 12 months.
Source: https://www.dol.gov/
Decision Framework / Q&A
Q1: I’m hiring a French cadre. Can I write 6 months probation?
Yes, but only as 4 months initial + renewable once if your convention collective permits. The CCN must explicitly allow renewal. Otherwise the renewal is void and the cadre is confirmed at 4 months.
Q2: My NZ company has 25 employees. Can I use the 90-day trial?
No. ERA s.67A is restricted to employers with <20 employees as at the date of the IEA. Use a probation period (s.67) instead — but you do NOT exclude grievance protection.
Q3: Australian probation — should I bother?
A contractual 6-month probation in Australia mirrors the NES minimum employment period. It signals the assessment phase to the employee and may reduce notice during probation. It does not change unfair-dismissal exposure (which kicks in at 6 months regardless).
Q4: UK new hire under ECCTA-era. What changes about probation?
The UK Employment Rights Bill (in Parliament) is set to introduce a statutory probationary period. Watch the Bill — when commencement orders are made, the 2-year threshold disappears.
Q5: Ontario new hire fired at month 4. Notice required?
Yes — ESA s.57 at month 4 requires 1 week notice (or pay in lieu). Common-law Bardal notice may apply on top if the contract doesn’t validly limit it.
Common Pitfalls (Gyoseishoshi View)
-
France: extending période d’essai by oral agreement — invalid; written renewal must be signed before initial period ends.
-
NZ: drafting 90-day trial when employer has 20+ employees — clause is void; employee has full grievance protection.
-
Australia: terminating in month 5 to avoid unfair-dismissal threshold and stating “no reason” — exposes employer to general protections and anti-discrimination claims.
-
UK: assuming probation reduces unfair-dismissal threshold — it doesn’t currently. The 2-year ERA threshold is independent.
-
Canada: contract excluding common-law notice without proper drafting — single clause invalid = entire termination clause invalid.
-
US: starting employee with 90-day “probation” that actually creates implied for-cause expectation — Montana, California, and some other states will treat it as quasi-contract.
Conclusion
Probation across the seven jurisdictions ranges from a fully codified system (France) to a purely contractual concept (UK pre-reform, US, Canada). The most-litigated point is whether the probation clause was drafted compliantly — France requires CCN authority for renewal, NZ requires <20 employees, Canada requires careful exclusion of common-law notice. Always draft the probation clause to fit the local statute before the employee signs the offer letter.
MmowW Scrib🐮 produces compliant probation clauses for each jurisdiction with the latest 2026 statutory bounds built in.
Multi-Country Documents with Scrib🐮
One platform, 18 document types, 7 countries. ¥22,000/month pass — unlimited access. Start Free Preview →
Disclaimer
Legal information, not legal advice. MmowW Scrib🐮 is operated by a licensed Gyoseishoshi (行政書士) office in Japan. We are not solicitors, barristers, attorneys, avocats, or licensed legal practitioners in any jurisdiction.
Sources
- France Code du travail L.1221-19: https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/codes/article_lc/LEGIARTI000006901075
- France L.1221-21 renewal: https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/codes/article_lc/LEGIARTI000006901076
- France L.1221-25 préavis: https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/codes/article_lc/LEGIARTI000006901080
- New Zealand ERA s.67A: https://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/2000/0024/latest/DLM58625.html
- New Zealand employment.govt.nz trial: https://www.employment.govt.nz/starting-employment/trial-and-probationary-periods/
- Australia Fair Work probation: https://www.fairwork.gov.au/employment-conditions/probation-periods
- Australia FW Act s.382/383: https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2024C00194
- UK ERA s.108 qualifying period: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1996/18/section/108
- UK Employment Rights Bill 2024–25: https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/3737
- Canada Ontario ESA s.54: https://www.ontario.ca/laws/statute/00e41
- US Montana Wrongful Discharge Act: https://leg.mt.gov/bills/mca/title_0390/chapter_0020/parts.html
Ask our AI assistant — free for 14 days
Ask our AI assistant — free for 14 days →MmowW Scrib🐮 — Company registration, made clear.
Start Free — 14 DaysNo credit card required
Disclaimer
Legal information, not legal advice. MmowW Scrib🐮 is operated by a licensed Gyoseishoshi (行政書士) office in Japan. We are not solicitors, barristers, attorneys, avocats, notaries, or licensed legal practitioners in any jurisdiction outside Japan. For binding legal advice, consult a qualified practitioner admitted in the relevant jurisdiction.
Loved for Safety.