Updated 2026-05-02

Australia Employee vs Independent Contractor: 2026 Test (s.15AA)

Quick Answer: The distinction between an employee and an independent contractor in Australia changed fundamentally on **26 August 2024**. The classification determines:
Table of Contents

The distinction between an employee and an independent contractor in Australia changed fundamentally on 26 August 2024. The Fair Work Legislation Amendment (Closing Loopholes No. 2) Act 2024 inserted s.15AA into the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth), restoring a “whole of relationship” test that overrides recent High Court decisions emphasising the written contract. This article maps the new test against the old, the practical consequences, and the contracting arrangements that survive in 2026.

Why It Matters

The classification determines:

Misclassification — calling a worker a contractor when they are really an employee — is a primary target of Fair Work Ombudsman enforcement, and post-Closing Loopholes No. 2, intentional misclassification can attract criminal penalties under s.327A (wage theft).

The Old Test — Personnel Contracting (2022) and Jamsek (2022)

In 2022, the High Court in Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union v Personnel Contracting Pty Ltd [2022] HCA 1 and ZG Operations Australia Pty Ltd v Jamsek [2022] HCA 2 emphasised that the terms of the written contract were paramount. If the contract said “independent contractor”, and there was no sham, that was largely the end of the inquiry.

This was a significant departure from the older multi-factor test (control, integration, business-on-own-account, tools/equipment, hours, exclusivity) that had developed through case law since Stevens v Brodribb Sawmilling Co Pty Ltd (1986) 160 CLR 16.

The Personnel Contracting / Jamsek approach made it relatively easy to draft workers as contractors. Some employers responded by issuing standard “independent contractor” agreements to roles that had previously been employee roles.

The New Test — s.15AA (from 26 August 2024)

Section 15AA, inserted by Closing Loopholes No. 2, provides that whether an individual is an employee or independent contractor is to be determined by ascertaining the real substance, practical reality and true nature of the relationship between the individual and the person. The interpretation must:

In effect, s.15AA restores a multi-factor test similar to the pre-2022 case law, with the important addition that how the contract is actually performed is now a co-equal consideration with the contract text.

Key indicia of an employee relationship under s.15AA

FactorEmployee-likeContractor-like
Control over how, when, where work is doneStrong control by hirerWorker controls own methods
Integration into hirer’s businessWorker integrated; uses hirer’s email, brandingWorker has own business identity
Business on own accountWorker has no separate business; works for one entityWorker has own ABN, multiple clients, marketing
Hours and exclusivitySet hours, exclusiveFlexible hours, multiple engagements
Tools and equipmentProvided by hirerProvided by worker
Risk and profitWage; no entrepreneurial riskWorker bears risk; can profit from efficiency
SubcontractingCannot delegateCan delegate to other workers
InsuranceHirer holds workers’ compensationWorker holds own insurance
GST and ABNWorker is paid net of PAYGWorker invoices with GST + ABN

No single factor is decisive; the tribunal weighs the full picture.

”High Income Threshold” Opt-Out — s.15AB

Section 15AB introduces a limited mechanism for high-income workers to opt out of employee classification. A worker can elect to be a contractor if:

Where opt-out is in place, the s.15AA test is displaced for that worker. The opt-out is intended to support genuine independent professionals (consultants, IT specialists, senior advisors) who structure their engagement through their own business.

FWO contractor vs employee guidance: https://www.fairwork.gov.au/find-help-for/independent-contractors/independent-contractors-and-employees-difference

Side-by-Side Comparison

IssueEmployeeIndependent Contractor
Governing lawFair Work Act 2009 (Cth); modern awardsCommon law contract; Independent Contractors Act 2006 (Cth); Competition and Consumer Act
Test for statusFair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s.15AA — totality of relationships.15AA negative result — not an employee
PayAward / agreement / NMW; min hourly rateNegotiated rate; quote / invoice
TaxPAYG withholding by employerWorker quotes ABN; pays own income tax
Super12% SG (1 July 2025)Generally none — but s.12(3) Superannuation Guarantee (Administration) Act 1992 may capture certain personal-services contractors
Annual leave4 weeks paid (NES)None
Personal leave10 days paid (NES)None
Notice / terminations.117 minimumsPer contract
Redundancys.119 (subject to small business exemption)None
Workers’ compensationCompulsory; employer paysWorker self-insures
Modern award coverageYes (if industry/role covered)No
Unfair dismissalYes (after minimum employment period)No
General protectionsYes (Pt 3-1)Limited application
FWIS / CEISRequiredNot required
Sham contractingn/aMisrepresenting employee as contractor is unlawful (s.357)

“Sham Contracting” — s.357

Even before s.15AA, sham contracting was unlawful. Under Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s.357, an employer must not represent to an employee or prospective employee that the relationship is one of independent contracting when in fact it is (or would be) one of employment. The penalty is up to 600 penalty units (around A$200,000+ for a body corporate; less for individuals).

Closing Loopholes No. 2 strengthened s.357 by:

Try it free →

The Practical Test — A Decision Matrix

If you are unsure whether a worker is an employee or contractor, run them through the s.15AA factors. A simple scoring approach:

Score each factor 0 (clearly contractor) to 5 (clearly employee):

  1. Does the hirer control the manner of work?
  2. Are working hours set by the hirer?
  3. Is the worker integrated into the hirer’s organisation chart?
  4. Is the worker exclusive to this hirer?
  5. Are tools and equipment provided by the hirer?
  6. Does the hirer bear the financial risk of the work?
  7. Is the worker prohibited from subcontracting?
  8. Does the worker hold their own insurance? (reverse score)
  9. Does the worker have other clients? (reverse score)
  10. Does the worker invoice with ABN/GST? (reverse score)

Total above 35/50 = strong employee profile. Below 15/50 = strong contractor profile. Between = run through s.15AA carefully and document the analysis.

Recent FWO Enforcement Patterns

Since 26 August 2024, the FWO has prioritised:

The Fair Work Commission also has expanded jurisdiction over “regulated worker” disputes — a third category between employee and contractor that Closing Loopholes introduced for road transport and digital platform workers (s.15D, s.15E, Pt 3A).

Steps for Hirers Engaging Workers in 2026

Step 1 — Run the s.15AA analysis upfront

Document the analysis. Note each factor and how it points.

Step 2 — Match the contract to the reality

If the s.15AA analysis points to employee, do not draft a contractor agreement. The contract text alone no longer determines the answer.

Step 3 — Consider the s.15AB opt-out for high-income individuals

Where appropriate, document the opt-out properly. It must be genuine.

Step 4 — For genuine contractors — proper paperwork

Step 5 — Periodic review

A relationship that started as contractor may evolve into employee-like over time. Periodic review (e.g. annual) protects against drift.

Step 6 — Pay super where required

Even some genuine contractors must receive super under Superannuation Guarantee (Administration) Act 1992 (Cth) s.12(3) — the “wholly or principally for the labour of the person” rule for personal-services contractors.

Common Misclassification Errors

Errors.15AA Outcome
Calling a full-time integrated worker a “contractor” because they have an ABNLikely employee — sham contracting risk
Set hours, exclusive, hirer-supplied equipment, but contract says “contractor”Likely employee
Worker has multiple clients but works full-time for one for an extended periodBorderline; check integration and control
”1-week-on/1-week-off” structure with same hirer for yearsLikely employee — pattern of dependence

Create your engagement package with Scrib🐼

„22,000/month pass for unlimited access to all 18 document types across 7 countries. Start Free Preview →


Disclaimer

Legal information, not legal advice. MmowW Scrib🐼 is operated by a licensed Gyoseishoshi (èĄŒæ”żæ›žćŁ«) office in Japan. We are not Australian solicitors, barristers, or migration agents.

Sources

Check employment-law rules

Check employment-law rules →

MmowW Scrib🐼 — Company registration, made clear.

Start Free — 14 Days

No credit card required

🩉
Takayuki Sawai — Gyoseishoshi

Licensed Gyoseishoshi (Administrative Scrivener) and founder of MmowW. Making company registration clear for entrepreneurs worldwide.

Loved for Safety.