AIO Answer: Flight logging requirements vary across countries. Japan mandates three separate logs (flight record, daily inspection, maintenance) with 3-year retention. Australia requires 7-year retention under CASA rules. EU states (DE, FR, NL, SE) require logs under EASA for Specific category with 3-year retention. The UK requires logging per Operational Authorisation conditions. The US recommends but does not strictly mandate flight logs for Part 107, though they are essential for proving compliance. Canada and NZ require logs per their certificate conditions.
Beyond regulatory compliance, flight logs protect your business. They prove due diligence in liability claims, track aircraft maintenance cycles, document crew experience hours, and provide evidence of safe operations for insurance renewals. Every serious commercial operator maintains comprehensive flight logs regardless of the minimum legal requirement.
| Country | Log Mandatory | Retention Period | Format | Key Log Items | Penalty for Non-Compliance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UK | Yes (Specific) | Per OA conditions | Digital or paper | Flight details, crew, conditions | Part of OA compliance |
| DE | Yes (Specific) | 3 years | Digital or paper | Per LBA requirements | Up to EUR 50,000 (LuftVO §44) |
| FR | Yes | 3 years | Digital or paper | Per DGAC requirements | Up to EUR 75,000 |
| NL | Yes (Specific) | 3 years | Digital or paper | Per ILT/OA conditions | Up to EUR 7,800 |
| SE | Yes | 3 years | Digital or paper | Per Transportstyrelsen | Criminal fines (dagsböter) |
| AU | Yes | 7 years | Digital or paper | CASA Part 101 requirements | Up to AU$16,500/offence |
| NZ | Recommended | Per certificate | Digital or paper | Part 101/102 standards | Up to NZ$50,000 (organizations) |
| CA | Yes | Per SFOC/RPOC | Digital or paper | CARs Part IX requirements | Up to CA$25,000 individual |
| US | Recommended | No set period | Digital or paper | 14 CFR 107.49 items | Burden of proof on pilot |
| JP | Yes (3 log books) | 3 years | Prescribed format | Flight/inspection/maintenance | Up to JPY 500,000 or 1yr |
Japan requires three separate log books under the Civil Aeronautics Act:
All three must be maintained for 3 years and produced upon request by MLIT inspectors. The prescribed format is detailed in MLIT guidance documents accessible through DIPS 2.0. Non-compliance can result in penalties up to JPY 500,000 or 1 year imprisonment.
CASA requires ReOC holders to retain flight records for 7 years — the longest among all 10 countries. This extended retention serves accident investigation purposes and allows CASA to conduct retrospective compliance audits. Records must include sufficient detail to reconstruct the circumstances of any flight. Digital records must be backed up and accessible throughout the retention period.
Part 107 does not explicitly mandate flight logs, but Section 107.49 requires pilots to be able to demonstrate compliance with all operating rules. In practice, flight logs are the primary means of demonstrating compliance during FAA inquiries or enforcement actions. The burden of proof falls on the operator. Professional operators maintain detailed logs for liability protection, insurance requirements, and client reporting.
EASA's framework distinguishes between Open and Specific category logging:
Germany's LBA can impose fines up to EUR 50,000 for inadequate record-keeping. France's DGAC can impose penalties up to EUR 75,000. Sweden uses criminal fines (dagsböter) scaled to income.
Post-Brexit, the UK follows its own framework. Operators with an Operational Authorisation (GBP 524/year for PDRA01) must maintain logs as specified in their Operations Manual. The CAA can audit these records as part of OA renewal or spot checks. The retention period is specified in the OA conditions.
Check your drone compliance instantly with our free tools.
Try it free →Modern flight logging increasingly uses digital platforms. Benefits include:
Important considerations for digital logging:
Flight logs serve a critical function in tracking pilot currency. While requirements vary:
Aircraft maintenance records are distinct from flight logs but equally important:
| Country | Maintenance Log Required | Retention | Maintenance Provider |
|---|---|---|---|
| UK | Yes (Specific) | Per OA | Competent person per ops manual |
| DE | Yes | 3 years | Per manufacturer or approved |
| FR | Yes | 3 years | Per manufacturer guidelines |
| AU | Yes | 7 years | Per CASA requirements |
| US | Recommended | No set period | Pilot or qualified technician |
| JP | Yes (separate log) | 3 years | Per MLIT standards |
| CA | Yes | Per certificate | Per Transport Canada standards |
Yes, most countries accept spreadsheets as a valid format for flight logging, provided they contain all required data fields and are maintained consistently. However, spreadsheets lack the tamper-evidence and automatic backup features of dedicated flight logging platforms. If using spreadsheets, implement version control and regular backups. Australia's 7-year retention requirement makes robust backup strategies essential.
Lost logs put you in a difficult position during regulatory audits or insurance claims. In the US, the burden of proof falls on the pilot — without logs, you cannot demonstrate Part 107 compliance. In Japan, failure to produce required logs when requested can result in penalties. In Australia, CASA considers inadequate record-keeping a compliance issue. Implement cloud backup and consider maintaining both digital and paper copies.
Detail requirements vary. Japan's prescribed format is the most detailed, requiring three separate log types. The US has the least prescriptive requirements. As a minimum best practice, record date, time, location, pilot, aircraft, flight duration, purpose, weather conditions, and any incidents. For Specific category operations in the EU and UK, follow the detail level specified in your Operations Manual or OA conditions.
Yes. Training and practice flights count toward total aircraft flight time (important for maintenance scheduling), pilot experience hours, and demonstrate competency maintenance. Some countries specifically require training flights to be logged. Even where not mandatory, logging all flights creates a comprehensive safety record.
In most countries, yes. MLIT inspectors in Japan can request flight logs during routine checks. CASA in Australia can audit records at any time. The FAA can request records during investigations. EU national authorities can inspect logs as part of OA oversight. The UK CAA can request records as part of ongoing surveillance. Keeping current, organized logs ensures you can respond to any request promptly.
Ready to streamline your drone operations? MmowW's free Pre-Flight Checklist tool helps you verify compliance before every mission.
Loved for Safety.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Drone regulations change frequently. Always verify current requirements with your national aviation authority before conducting operations.
Check your drone compliance with MmowW's free tools:
🇬🇧 UK | 🇩🇪 DE | 🇫🇷 FR | 🇳🇱 NL | 🇸🇪 SE | 🇦🇺 AU | 🇳🇿 NZ | 🇨🇦 CA | 🇺🇸 US | 🇯🇵 JP
MmowW Drone integrates flight logging, risk assessment, and regulatory compliance in one place. Available in 10 countries.
Start 14-Day Free Trial →No credit card required. From £5.29/month.
Loved for Safety.
Lass dich nicht von Vorschriften aufhalten!
Ai-chan🐣 beantwortet deine Compliance-Fragen 24/7 mit KI
Kostenlos testen